Lost your password?
Don't have an account? Sign Up

Inducement of Breach of Contract Damages Singapore

Inducement of breach of contract is a legal term that refers to the act of persuading someone to breach a contract they have entered into. This breach can result in damages, which the injured party may seek compensation for in a court of law. In Singapore, inducement of breach of contract damages is a topic that has garnered a fair amount of attention. In this article, we will explore what inducement of breach of contract damages are in Singapore and how they are assessed.

What is Inducement of Breach of Contract?

Inducement of breach of contract is a civil offence that occurs when someone intentionally interferes with a contractual relationship between two parties. This interference may involve encouraging or persuading one of the parties to breach the terms of the contract. The breach may be a failure to perform a specific obligation or a refusal to perform it altogether.

For instance, if an employer induces an employee to leave their current job before the expiration of their employment contract, the employer could be liable for inducing breach of contract. The employee`s current employer may sue the new employer for damages.

Inducement of Breach of Contract Damages in Singapore

In Singapore, inducement of breach of contract damages is assessed by taking into account several factors. These factors include the following:

1. The nature of the contract: The nature of the contract breached is a significant factor when assessing damages. Contracts that involve a high level of trust and confidentiality, such as employment contracts or partnership agreements, may attract higher damages.

2. The severity of the breach: The extent of the breach and the gravity of the consequences incurred by the party affected is also a factor that determines the amount of damages. If the breach leads to significant financial losses, emotional distress, or reputational damage, the damages awarded may be significant.

3. The foreseeability of the breach: The defendant must have known or ought to have known that their actions would result in a breach of the contract. If it is found that the defendant acted intentionally and knowingly induced the breach, they may be liable for higher damages.

4. The duration of the loss: In some cases, the duration of the loss incurred by the affected party is also taken into account when assessing damages. A breach that results in a long-term loss may attract higher damages than a short-term loss.


Inducement of breach of contract damages in Singapore is a serious issue that can have significant legal and financial implications. As a professional, it is crucial to understand the legal implications of this issue to offer helpful insights to readers. Anyone who suspects that they have been induced to breach a contract should seek the advice and guidance of a qualified lawyer.